Skip to content
CADRE UK
Disabled people and researchers reviewing documents together at a community working session

Commander's intent

Preventing foreseeable harm, before it happens.

CADRE UK is a national, evidence-led coalition examining how councils and other public bodies anticipate disabled people's requirements, make reasonable adjustments, and stop institutional decisions from creating or intensifying vulnerability.

Commander's intent

What we are here to do, how we will do it, and what success looks like.

Purpose

Establish a national, evidence-led coalition to examine and improve how councils and other public bodies anticipate disabled people’s requirements, discharge duties to make reasonable adjustments, identify foreseeable risks, and prevent institutional decisions or environments from creating or intensifying vulnerability.

Method

Bring together disabled people, representative organisations, researchers and practitioners to document recurring mechanisms of harm; analyse their legal, administrative and organisational causes; and develop practical proposals for prevention, transparent decision-making and accountability. Individual experience is treated as a source of evidence and inquiry, assessed alongside legislation, policy, institutional records and comparative cases.

End state

Public bodies recognise and discharge anticipatory duties as a routine part of governance and service design. Avoidable barriers are identified and removed before harm occurs; failures are recorded and addressed; and disabled people are not required to bear the continuing cost of pursuing change case by case.

Founding principle

The burden of preventing foreseeable disability-related harm belongs within public-body planning and governance. It should not rest on disabled people having to identify, explain and repeatedly contest avoidable barriers.

Problem definition

We will investigate whether, how and why public bodies fail to anticipate disabled people's needs, provide reasonable adjustments, or recognise foreseeable effects on health, wellbeing and financial security.

That includes circumstances where policies, procedures, physical or digital environments, service interfaces, procurement decisions or administrative practices create or compound barriers.

Tested, not assumed

The project begins from a concern about systemic patterns of practice and institutional culture. It will test that concern through evidence and comparative analysis, rather than assume that every authority or service fails in the same way.

See the principal questions

Six principal questions

The research questions that frame every strand of evidence-gathering and analysis.

  1. Q1

    How are anticipatory duties understood, assigned and implemented within councils and other public bodies?

  2. Q2

    What organisational conditions contribute to failures of foresight, adjustment or risk recognition?

  3. Q3

    In what ways can public decisions, systems or environments create or intensify vulnerability?

  4. Q4

    What health, wellbeing, participation and financial consequences follow from these failures?

  5. Q5

    How are responsibility, remedy and accountability allocated when foreseeable harm occurs?

  6. Q6

    Which governance, service-design and scrutiny mechanisms can prevent recurrence?

Proposed scope

The initial study focuses on local government while retaining a national remit across the United Kingdom, examining differences in law, policy and institutional arrangements between the four jurisdictions.

  • England
  • Scotland
  • Wales
  • Northern Ireland

Where necessary, the project may examine interactions with other public services, regulators, contractors and providers whose decisions affect local authority access and outcomes.

A person using a wheelchair approaching a step-free ramp at a council building entrance

The scope includes

  • Anticipatory duties and reasonable adjustments
  • Assessment of foreseeable disability-related requirements and risks
  • Institutional practices that create, maintain or compound barriers
  • Effects on health, wellbeing, autonomy, participation and finances
  • Governance, complaints, scrutiny, remedy and accountability
  • Preventive approaches to accessible policy and service design

Evidence and method

A mixed-method, interdisciplinary approach that sets individual experience alongside law, policy and institutional records.

  • Structured accounts from disabled people and representative organisations
  • Analysis of legislation, guidance, policies and public-body procedures
  • Documented case studies, with consent and protection of personal information
  • Comparative analysis across authorities and service settings
  • Examination of the organisational causes and consequences of identified failures

Every finding is labelled

Findings distinguish between four kinds of claim. We identify the limits of the available evidence and avoid generalising beyond what the material supports.

Established fact
Verified against records or primary sources.
Reported experience
Lived-experience accounts, treated as evidence.
Legal interpretation
How duties and remedies are read and applied.
Research hypothesis
Propositions still being tested.

Scoping-phase outputs

Five deliverables, each building on the last, take the project from definition to recommendation.

  1. 1

    National framework

    Defining the project’s concepts, boundaries and research questions.

  2. 2

    Evidence map

    Of anticipatory duties, reasonable-adjustment practice and accountability routes.

  3. 3

    Case-study protocol

    For collecting and analysing lived-experience evidence safely and consistently.

  4. 4

    Mechanisms analysis

    An initial analysis of recurring institutional mechanisms that create or compound barriers.

  5. 5

    Recommendations

    Practical proposals for prevention, governance, remedy and public accountability.

Help build the evidence.

CADRE UK is forming now. We want to hear from anyone with experience, expertise or records that can help show where foresight fails — and how it can be designed in.

  • Disabled people
  • Representative organisations
  • Researchers
  • Practitioners
Join the coalition